The “American People” and “U.S. citizens” are two different things

A "US citizen" does not have any rights.
A "US citizen" is a corporation.
“…it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a "citizen" of the United States. ….. A "citizen" of any one of the States of the Union is held to be and called a "citizen" of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing.” — Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep. 300.

Therefore a "US citizen" is a piece of property. If you read any of those old court cases prior to the civil war where slavery was the issue, the debate was ALWAYS over property rights, therefore a "US citizen" is a SLAVE.

The Fourteenth Amendment defines what a "US citizen" is;

“Section 1. All "persons" born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are "citizens" of the United States,…..”

The so-called Fourteenth Amendment criminally converts "US citizenship" completely upside down from what the founding fathers intended it to be.

and “US citizens” can even murder their unborn children by committing the common law crime of infanticide, because the unborn are NOT “persons”, they are by definition State Citizens, which means the BAR members (foreign agents of the Crown) in the so-called courts are engaged in genocide against the American sovereignty, and this is proof that it has nothing to do with race, and has everything to do with slavery;
“The unborn are not included within the definition of “person” as used in the 14th Amendment.” — Roe v. Wade, US Supreme Court, 410 US 13, 35L. Ed. 2d 147, 1973.

“[T]he term “citizen,” in the United States, is analogous to the term “subject” in the common law.” — State vs Manual 20 NC 122, 14 C.J.S. 4, p 430.

and a “US citizen” is a fictitious entity, and has no rights;
“Therefore, the "U.S. citizens" residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as “individual entities.” — Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L. Ed. 1143, 56 S. Ct. 773.

“In our opinion, it was not the intent of the legislature to restrict the operation of the
statute to those only who were subjects of the United States government …”
— Prowd v. Gore (1922) 57 Cal. App. 458, 459-461 [emphasis added]

“Upon the other hand, the 14th Amendment, upon the subject of citizenship, Declares
only that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States, and of the state wherein they
reside.” Here there is a limitation to a person born or naturalized in the United States,
which is not extended to a person born in any place “subject to their jurisdiction.””
— Downes v. Bidwell (1900) 182 U.S. 244, 249-251, 45 L. Ed. 1088, 1092, [emphasis added]

A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states. — Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625 (1914)

Posted in Off-Topic on May 20 at 04:04 AM

Comments (0)

No login